MEKAWIRE
Research

Papers

New robotics and physical-AI papers, with what each one means for the industry.

7 papers
TopicAllManipulation · 27VLA · 22Perception · 12Robotics · 11Navigation · 10Humanoid · 9Learning · 8Safety · 5World Action Models · 4Simulation · 3Aerial manipulation · 2Dexterous manipulation · 2Sim-to-Real Manipulation · 2Social Navigation · 2Vision-Language Navigation · 2World models · 2World-action model · 23D Assembly · 13DGS dataset · 15G Simulation · 1AMR Operations · 1Active vision manipulation · 1Adaptive MPC · 1Adaptive action horizons · 1Adaptive intervention · 1Aerial · 1Aerial Manipulation · 1Aerial navigation · 1Agricultural Robotics · 1Articulation Estimation · 1Autonomous Driving · 1Autonomous Exploration · 1Battery-aware RL · 1Belief-space planning · 1Bimanual Manipulation · 1Byzantine localization · 1Canal inspection · 1Co-speech Humanoid · 1Compositional Manipulation · 1Construction navigation · 1Contact-Rich Manipulation · 1Contact-rich Manipulation · 1Continuum sensing · 1Curriculum RL · 1Dexterous Manipulation · 1Distributed Manipulation · 1Distribution Shift · 1Driving Simulation · 1Efficient VIO · 1Egocentric data · 1Egocentric video · 1Embodied Agents · 1Embodied policy · 1Empowerment MPC · 1Endoscopic navigation · 1Endovascular robotics · 1Event-camera VO · 1Exoskeletons · 1Failure recovery · 1Federated 3D Perception · 1Fisheye detection · 1Floorplan SLAM · 1Geometry-aware manipulation · 1Grasping · 1Grounding · 1Humanoid Control · 1Humanoid RL · 1Humanoid Tool Use · 1Humanoid control · 1Humanoid loco-manipulation · 1Humanoid safety · 1Imitation Learning · 1JEPA World Models · 1Lab automation · 1Laboratory Manipulation · 1Latent World Models · 1Legged Manipulation · 1LiDAR Security · 1Lifelong RL · 1Locomotion · 1MAPF · 1MAV guidance · 1Manipulation LfD · 1Manipulation Safety · 1Marine simulation · 1Memory-centric VLA · 1Miniature Locomotion · 1Mining Perception · 1Mobile manipulation · 1Model-based RL · 1Monocular SSC · 1Motion Planning · 1Multi-Agent RL · 1Multi-Robot Exploration · 1Multi-Robot Manipulation · 1Multi-UAV Exploration · 1Multi-UAV State Estimation · 1Multi-agent RL · 1Multi-agent motion planning · 1Multi-camera odometry · 1Multi-fidelity RL · 1Multi-robot manipulation · 1Multi-skill Manipulation · 1Multi-view perception · 1Multimodal simulation · 1Navigation & Mapping · 1Object Pose Estimation · 1Object Search · 1Panoramic 3D Detection · 1Panoramic segmentation · 1Pedestrian tracking · 1PersonNav · 1Planning · 1Policy · 1Policy Optimization · 1Preference Learning · 1Quadruped locomotion · 1Real-time VLA · 1Real-to-sim · 1Representation alignment · 1Robot-Use Agents · 1Runtime Verification · 1Safe Generative Planning · 1Safe RL-MPC · 1Safe VLA · 1Safety monitoring · 1Safety-critical control · 1Sim-to-real Navigation · 1Sim-to-real manipulation · 1Simulation geometry · 1Skill Discovery · 1Social navigation · 1Soft Pneumatic Actuators · 1Soft manipulation · 1Sonar SLAM · 1Streaming 3D reconstruction · 1Submovement decomposition · 1Surgical robotics · 1Tactile · 1Tactile Exploration · 1Tactile VLA · 1Temporal manipulation · 1Terrain traversability · 1Text-to-3D Policy · 1Tool Co-Design · 1Trajectory Correction · 1Traversability · 1UAV Navigation · 1UAV Swarms · 1UAV traffic monitoring · 1Underwater Robotics · 1Underwater active mapping · 1Underwater perception · 1Unified world-action model · 1VLA Conditioning · 1VLA Defense · 1VLA Robustness · 1VLA evaluation · 1VLA manipulation · 1VLA robustness · 1Video world models · 1Visual Generalization · 1Visual Grounding · 1Visual Reward Models · 1Visuomotor Fusion · 1Visuotactile manipulation · 1World Models · 1World-Action Models · 1
Filtered by technology world-model · clear
arXiv
ManipulationExpert

Grounded-Dreamer: Robot Learning from World Model Synthetic Data with Physical Grounding

Feng Jiang, Shu Chen, Yuanfei Wang, Yuan Li, Zhenhao Shen, Jiaqi Liang, Yang Chen, Lei Wei, Chen Xie, Ruihai Wu

Scaling robot manipulation policies requires large amounts of diverse, action-labeled data, yet collecting such data in the real world remains expensive and difficult to scale. Existing methods either depend on human teleoperation, rely on simulation with limited visual realism, or use human videos that lack embodiment-specific annotations.

arXiv
LearningExpert

Dream to Remember: Continual Steering of Generalist Robot Policies with World Models

Bahey Tharwat, Iman Nematollahi, Marvin Alles, Xingyuan Zhang, Akshay L Chandra, Abhinav Valada

Generalist robot policies are trained with imitation learning and are bounded by the quality and coverage of their demonstrations. Reinforcement learning can improve and extend them, either by fine-tuning the policy weights or by training a small module to steer the input noise of a frozen generative policy.

arXiv
ManipulationExpert

Beyond Successful Robot Demonstrations: Learning from Human Interactions and Modeling Failure Dynamics

Peiyan Tu, Cong Wang, Hanxin Zhu, Xin Jin, Zhibo Chen

Action-conditioned world models offer a promising foundation for generalist robotic intelligence by predicting the consequences of actions. However, existing robotic datasets provide limited coverage of the diverse interaction dynamics required for generalizable world modeling.

arXiv
JEPA World ModelsExpert

AVL-JEPA: Preventing Causal Dynamics Information Collapse In Joint Embedding Predictive Architecture World Models

Yikang Qiao, Ling Zhang, Ziying Song, Duan Huang

This arXiv preprint introduces AVL-JEPA, a training method that stops joint-embedding world models from discarding action-conditioned physical dynamics while preserving visual representations. Across four simulated robot control tasks, it reaches 81.5% success on PushT and 88.7% on TwoRoom under Gaussian input noise, versus 15.3% and 65.7% for the baseline, while maintaining competitive clean-environment performance. The work matters for robot planners that must stay reliable when camera or state observations are noisy.

arXiv
Latent World ModelsExpert

Supervise What Decides Success: Criterion-Aligned Auxiliary Losses for Latent World-Model Planning

Takumi Hara, Kanata Suzuki

This preprint introduces a training-time auxiliary loss for latent world models: a temporary linear head regresses the physical quantities used in a task's success criterion directly from latent states. On PushT and cube it raises planning success by 3.5 and 3.4 absolute points over the same baseline, with significant paired-test gains, while leaving test-time model and inputs unchanged. It matters because success criteria can tell world models exactly which physical quantities the latent state must retain for reliable planning.

arXiv
Model-based RLExpert

Beyond Policy Alignment: Closing the Planning-Learning Loop for Robot Control with Learned World Models

Kowndinya Boyalakuntla, Yuhan Liu, Abdeslam Boularias

This preprint extends policy-constrained TD-MPC into PL-MPC by changing critic training targets, MPPI terminal values, and actor distillation without altering the world model or planner. On HumanoidBench, it lifts total average return from 98±18 to 387±255 on balance-hard and from 199±13 to 466±200 on hurdle; in zero-shot sim-to-real wrench–nut alignment on a KUKA IIWA14 it achieves 74.2% vs 61.3% success on the training object size. The result matters because it shows targeted interactions in the planning–learning loop can improve hard robot control tasks beyond the usual planner–policy alignment.

arXiv
LearningExpert

Anisotropic Representations Improve Planning in JEPA World Models

Mingu Kang, Yoori Oh, Sookyung Kim, Joonseok Lee

Latent world models learn action-conditioned dynamics in representation space and often score candidate actions by Euclidean distance to a goal representation. Joint training typically regularizes the representation to prevent collapse, but the resulting representation geometry also determines how terminal errors are weighted during planning.

Topic pages

Papers come from arXiv robotics feeds. Where our summary is not written yet, you see the opening lines of the abstract.