BusinessUnited States

NAPA Auto Parts picks Hai Robotics' HaiPick robots, integrated by Hy-Tek, for a US flow-center overhaul

Published 2 min read
Source
BusinessHai Robotics

Chinese warehouse-robot maker Hai Robotics and US integrator Hy-Tek Intralogistics said in a press release on Oct 15 that NAPA Auto Parts has selected them to automate its flow-center operations with a multi-robot HaiPick system.

The release gives no site, robot count, contract value or start date. The win comes as US rules on foreign-produced robots tighten, a risk MEKAWIRE has tracked since the FCC's July notice.

NAPA Auto Parts, the US parts distributor with nearly 6,000 stores, has chosen Shenzhen-based Hai Robotics and US integrator Hy-Tek Intralogistics to automate its flow-center operations, the two suppliers said in a press release on Oct 15. Hy-Tek designed the system around several HaiPick models, Hai Robotics' line of case-handling autonomous storage and retrieval robots.

The announcement is thin on numbers, and that is the first thing a buyer or investor should notice. It does not name the facility, the number of robots, the storage positions, the contract value or when the system goes live.

What the release does say

Hy-Tek acted as systems integrator and engineered a multi-robot Hai Robotics system meant to handle NAPA's varied SKU profile in one automated storage and retrieval solution, according to the release. Before committing, NAPA tested the technology in Hy-Tek's Innovation Lab, which the companies describe as a live warehouse environment, to validate performance and refine the design. The stated goals are higher storage density, throughput and order accuracy. NAPA's network carries about 800,000 parts, accessories and supplies and serves more than 18,000 auto-care centres, the release says.

Executives from all three companies are quoted: Hy-Tek's Derek Miller and Hai Robotics' Hunter Senn, both vice presidents of sales, and NAPA design-engineering director Tyler Park, who said the lab trial gave the team confidence before implementation.

Why the try-before-you-buy lab matters

Case-handling robots that climb racks to fetch totes and cartons are sold against fixed shuttle and cube-storage systems. A lab where a customer can run its own SKUs reduces the integration risk that slows these deals, and it shifts bargaining power toward integrators that own such facilities.

MEKAWIRE analysis

The deal shows Chinese warehouse robots are still winning blue-chip US accounts through American integrators, but the integrator, not the robot maker, now carries the political risk.

Hai Robotics last disclosed new capital in 2021, when it raised a combined USD 200m Series C and D, according to MEKAWIRE's database. Its listed rival Geek+ said US revenue overtook China in 2025. Both rely on US partners to win and service accounts like NAPA.

Warehouse-robot makers: latest disclosed capital events in MEKAWIRE data
  • Hai Robotics
    Country
    China
    Event
    Series C and D (combined)
    Date
    Sep 21, 2021
    Amount
    USD 200m
  • Exotec
    Country
    France
    Event
    Series D at USD 2bn post-money
    Date
    Jan 17, 2022
    Amount
    USD 335m
  • Locus Robotics
    Country
    US
    Event
    Series F
    Date
    Nov 29, 2022
    Amount
    USD 117m
  • Geek+
    Country
    China
    Event
    HKEX listing
    Date
    Jul 9, 2025
    Amount
    HKD 2.71bn

Disclosed figures from company and exchange releases; not estimates.

As of Oct 16, 2026

The strongest counter-argument to the risk view is that the US Federal Communications Commission's July 28 public notice on adding foreign-produced advanced robots to its Covered List has not, as far as the companies have disclosed, been applied to warehouse AS/RS. Korea's robot association set up a response team in September, which MEKAWIRE reported, and Hai Robotics' release does not mention the rule.

Bull case: NAPA rolls the design across its distribution network and Hy-Tek becomes a repeat channel. Bear case: a covered-list decision or customer caution freezes follow-on sites. Signals to watch: any FCC order on robots, a NAPA site announcement with robot counts, and Hai Robotics' next funding or listing filing.

Good or bad news for the company?

 

Key facts
Scope
Automated fulfilment for NAPA flow-center operations, multi-robot AS/RS
Customer
NAPA Auto Parts: nearly 6,000 stores, 18,000+ auto-care centres, about 800,000 parts
Suppliers
Hai Robotics (HaiPick Systems) with Hy-Tek Intralogistics as integrator
Validation
Pre-deployment trial in Hy-Tek's Innovation Lab
Announcement
Hai Robotics press release, Oct 15, 2026
Not disclosed
Site, robot count, contract value, go-live date
Sources
MEKAWIRE Intelligence
  1. 01

    Why it matters

    A large, named US distributor choosing a Chinese AS/RS vendor is a reference account in a market where references decide deals, at a moment when US policy on foreign robots is under review.

  2. 02

    Rival analysis

    HaiPick competes with Exotec's Skypod, AutoStore cube storage, Geek+ and Locus Robotics. Exotec and Locus have disclosed larger late-stage rounds in our data; AutoStore and Geek+ are listed.

  3. 03

    Valuation context

    Hai Robotics' last disclosed round in MEKAWIRE data is the combined USD 200m Series C and D of Sep 2021; no newer valuation is disclosed.

  4. 04

    Supply-chain implications

    Robots are made by a Shenzhen company and integrated and serviced in the US by Hy-Tek, which concentrates any regulatory exposure on hardware origin.

  5. 05

    Signals to watch

    FCC decisions on the robot covered list; NAPA site disclosures; Hai Robotics capital-markets filings.

  6. 06

    Analyst view

    Confidence medium that this is a meaningful reference win; low on its size, which is undisclosed.

  7. 07

    Questions you should be asking

    How many robots and sites? Is the contract hardware sale or robots-as-a-service? How would an FCC listing affect installed systems?